| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:09:39 +0100, Ralf wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Btrfs supports Raid10 but no block-crypto. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> If I would use a HD->MD Raid->Luks->Btrfs stack, I don't benefit from |
| 6 |
> the Raid implementation of Btrfs. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Nor do you get the automatic repair of corruption that btrfs RAID offers. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> If I would use a HD->Luks->Btrfs stack, then I would have to use four |
| 11 |
> different LUKS devices, which results in four individual encryptions |
| 12 |
> (and I don't have AES-NI, so this would be a tremendous slowdown). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It would definitely be slower, but maybe not "tremendously". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> What would be the best way to have a Raid 10 together with a encrypted |
| 17 |
> Btrfs? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
What about crypto on top of btrfs using a stacked filesystem like |
| 20 |
ecryptfs? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
A good pun is its own reword. |
Archives