Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dan Egli <dan@×××××××××××.site>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o, Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Going through these one by one.
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 04:42:21
Message-Id: 5671ff99-e475-b2a1-b0af-d719429da15b@newideatest.site
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Going through these one by one. by Steven Lembark
1 On 2/13/2021 2:41 PM, Steven Lembark wrote:
2
3 [snip]
4 > Bumps into not having sys-apps/portage-9999::gentoo:
5 > # $emerge dev-db/pgmodeler
6 > Calculating dependencies... done!
7 >
8 > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "sys-apps/portage[python_targets_python2_7(-),python_targets_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_5(-),-python_single_target_python3_6(-),-python_single_target_python3_7(-)]" have been masked.
9 > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
10 > - sys-apps/portage-9999::gentoo (masked by: missing keyword)
11
12 Portage-9999 is risky since it's VERY MUCH still developmental. BUT, if
13 you really want it, add this to your package.accept_keywords:
14 sys-apps/portage **
15
16 Include the two stars.  That will override missing keyword. It may be
17 better to specify a full token rather than a shortcut. In that case use:
18 =sys-apps/portage-9999 **
19
20 --
21
22 Dan Egli
23 On my test server

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Going through these one by one. cal <cal@×××××××××.technology>
Re: [gentoo-user] Going through these one by one. Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com>