1 |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On 13 April 2011 16:35, Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:50:02PM +0200, deadeyes wrote: |
4 |
> >> |
5 |
> >> I was searching around the gentoo forums for ifmetric and found this piece of |
6 |
> >> code that can be added in /etc/conf.d/net: |
7 |
> >> postup() { |
8 |
> >> local metric=0 |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> case "${IFACE}" in |
11 |
> >> eth0) metric=0 ;; |
12 |
> >> eth1) metric=1 ;; |
13 |
> >> esac |
14 |
> >> ifmetric "${IFACE}" "${metric}" |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> return 0 |
17 |
> >> } |
18 |
> >> |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Hey, that works very well here -- thanks! |
21 |
> > Been wanting that solution for some time now. |
22 |
> > :) |
23 |
> |
24 |
> My apologies! It took some time between reading your message and |
25 |
> replying to it - by which time I had forgotten the finer points. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Whether you set NIC priority in the /etc/conf.d/net file or in a post |
28 |
> up script, the result is the same. One NIC will have a higher |
29 |
> priority than another for ALL connections. This is because NICs do |
30 |
> not do NATing. They will send all packets out to the gateway |
31 |
> (192.168.1.1) and the router at the gateway will determine which |
32 |
> packet is forwarded to the Internet and which to the LAN. So, if you |
33 |
> do not want to prioritise one NIC over another, it may be better to |
34 |
> use iptables to route LAN packets via a particular NIC instead. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> Regards, |
38 |
> Mick |
39 |
|
40 |
Actually I do want to prioritise one over the other, when both are |
41 |
connected. Using netplug with one wired and one wireless, and the |
42 |
referenced script in /etc/conf.d/net. |
43 |
|
44 |
Am I doing it wrong? :) |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
/\ /\ |
48 |
<\ /> |
49 |
^ caveat utilitor |
50 |
'v-v' |