| 1 |
Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> -------- Original Message -------- |
| 5 |
> Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization |
| 6 |
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500 |
| 7 |
> From: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> |
| 8 |
> Reply-To: gentoo-project@l.g.o |
| 9 |
> To: gentoo-project@l.g.o |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Richard Yao wrote: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> Dear Everyone, |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> It is no secret that many of us are unhappy with the direction that udev |
| 17 |
>> has taken under the leadership of the systemd developers. That includes |
| 18 |
>> Linus Torvalds, who is 'leery of the fact that the udev maintenance |
| 19 |
>> seems to have gone into some "crazy mode" where they have made changes |
| 20 |
>> that were known to be problematic, and are pure and utter stupidity.' |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505 |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> After speaking with several other Gentoo developers that share Linus' |
| 25 |
>> concerns, I have decided to form a team to fork udev. Our plan is to |
| 26 |
>> eliminate the separate /usr requirement from our fork, among other |
| 27 |
>> things. We will announce the project later this week. |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related to |
| 30 |
>> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another |
| 31 |
>> month so that we have time to get organized? |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> Yours truly, |
| 34 |
>> Richard Yao |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> I wonder what they will name it tho. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> Dale |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> :-) :-) |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
What about gdev (gentoo dev) :) |
Archives