1 |
On 30/01/2017 13:57, John Covici wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:37:01 -0500, |
3 |
> Tuomo Hartikainen wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Hi John, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> On 2017-01-29 05:11, John Covici wrote: |
8 |
>>> Hi. I am having a couple of preserved rebuild problems which I have |
9 |
>>> no idea how to fix. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> The first one is like this: |
12 |
>>>>>> package: sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27 |
13 |
>>> * - /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so |
14 |
>>> * used by |
15 |
>>> /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.25.1/libopcodes-2.25.1.so |
16 |
>>> (sys-devel/binutils-2.25.1-r1) |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> I had this same loop last week, and I found this[1] forum thread |
19 |
>> helpful. Apparently on my and janos666's systems the |
20 |
>> /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so library was erroneously left behind by a |
21 |
>> previous depclean. If you dare, first make sure the library is not owned |
22 |
>> by any current package: `equery b /usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so`. If it's |
23 |
>> not, removing the file manually should do the trick. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Remember to take precautions though, khayyam suggests binpkg but I just |
26 |
>> took a copy of that library so I could put it back with a rescue system |
27 |
>> if binutils broke. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> [1]: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1042488-start-0.html |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Unfortunately the file is owned by |
32 |
> sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27 |
33 |
> |
34 |
> There is a 2.25 version as well. Now in the binutils itself I have |
35 |
> several versions at the same time. |
36 |
> But there is no other version of sys-libs/binutils-libs but the 2.27. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
are you saying that you only have one version of binutils installed |
42 |
(2.27)? That seems to be the norm nowadays, the other slots are probably |
43 |
for "old stuff" |
44 |
|
45 |
IUf you have other versions' cruft still lying around in |
46 |
/usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/, then move that junk out the |
47 |
way and try again. It's very likely dynamic runtime nonsense that |
48 |
depclean didn't know about |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Alan McKinnon |
52 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |