1 |
On Saturday 17 December 2016 20:21:33 Walter Dnes wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 09:51:07PM +0100, Marc Joliet wrote |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On Saturday 17 December 2016 14:10:04 Walter Dnes wrote: |
5 |
> > > A note; the developers have stated in the Pale Moon forum that they're |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > working on getting rid of gstreamer, and having Pale Moon talk directly |
8 |
> > > to ffmpeg and libav. This gets rid of one layer of middleware, and the |
9 |
> > > associated security problems. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > FWIW, that's most likely because Firefox did that a few releases |
12 |
> > ago (I unset the gstreamer USE flag with 44.0, and AFAIK gstreamer |
13 |
> > support was completely removed with 46.0). |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Not "because Firefox did that", but because it's a good idea. Yes, |
16 |
> Firefox sometimes makes the right choice. While Pale Moon does not |
17 |
> blindly follow Firefox (e.g. Australis), gstreamer is a pain and a |
18 |
> security problem. First Pale Moon had to migrate from gstreamer 0.10.x |
19 |
> (inherited from Firefox code) to gstreamer 1.x. And now they have to |
20 |
> blacklist certain gstreamer plugins. Enough already. |
21 |
|
22 |
Sorry, I didn't mean that Pale moon "blindly follows" Firefox, I was primarily |
23 |
thinking of the progression upstream -> downstream (even as a fork, I expect |
24 |
that they'll want most of the low-level changes). |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Marc Joliet |
28 |
-- |
29 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
30 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |