1 |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Eric Martin <freak4uxxx@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Eric Martin <freak4uxxx@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> Albert Hopkins wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> Doesn't Gmail support SSL? My email provider provides support for SSL |
11 |
>>>> connections (via HTTP, LDAP, & POP). |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> If that's the case then it would be extremely difficult (you will need |
14 |
>>>> to "fake" the server's host keys). Furthermore, the ethics of such a |
15 |
>>>> practice is questionable. For which case I would side on blocking |
16 |
>>>> outside emails altogether rather than get into a situation where you |
17 |
>>>> have to justify sniffing someone's personal bank transactions, e.g. |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>>> -a |
20 |
>>>> |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> |
23 |
>>>> |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>>> gmail is only ssl on sign in if you go through webmail. After that it's |
26 |
>>> all in the clear. POP and IMAP are running securely however (which is |
27 |
>>> why I check my stuff via imap) |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> If you simply change the URL to https on gmail, you are using SSL. |
32 |
>> The default is not to use it, so, you gotta type it yourself. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> https://mail.google.com/mail |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Has it always been that way? I could have sworn that only the login was SSL |
39 |
> and everything else was in the clear (granted, I don't think I ever tried to |
40 |
> change it to https). Live & Learn |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I don't know if it was always that way, what I know is that maybe 2 |
44 |
years ago some machines with IE6 couldn't reach gmail, and a quick |
45 |
search showed that switching to HTTPS would solve it. As I knew that |
46 |
was also giving me encryption, I began to type the complete address |
47 |
with "s" wherever I use my account. |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
Daniel da Veiga |