Archives
Archives
| From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations | ||
| Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:45:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEH5T2N1v6tD+3_6_1ZyRN_s8otgumn27uK3YuKC3Qn8BByk_A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations by felix@crowfix.com | ||
| 1 | On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:16 AM, <felix@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > I bought a USB 3.0 disk enclosure and the system refused to even acknowledge its presence. USB 3.0 may be advertised as backwards compatible, but not on my system. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Is the drive powered by USB, or an external power supply? USB3 |
| 5 | supplies more power than USB2 was capable of, so if a USB3 device does |
| 6 | not have an external power supply it probably won't be backwards |
| 7 | compatible. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Getting around ancient SATA disk size limitations | felix@×××××××.com |