Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:59:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060831195226.5acba8d5@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1 by "Thomas T. Veldhouse" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:48:36 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > As has always been the case, C++ applications are probably the most |
| 4 | > likely to be affected by ABI changes. So, if you run KDE or Qt apps, |
| 5 | > then it is probably a very good idea to rebuild world. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Or just rebuild QT and KDE. That's all I did, along with glibc to be on |
| 8 | the safe side, with no apparent problems. Although I do run ~arch, so |
| 9 | most packages get rebuilt quite often in the normal course of events. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Neil Bothwick |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Why do Kennedy's cry after sex? ..... Mace! |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1 | "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.1 with gentoo 2006.1 | Philip Webb <purslow@×××××××××.ca> |