| 1 |
On 26 Feb 2010, at 12:19, daid kahl wrote: |
| 2 |
> ... |
| 3 |
> My question is if anyone is going to accept this as a reasonable |
| 4 |
> "feature" addition to alsa-mixer on the main portage tree. I assume |
| 5 |
> perhaps not, but I can't really see almost any advantage of the forced |
| 6 |
> black background. If you want a black background, I say run the |
| 7 |
> terminal that way. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I didn't make the patch, so I have no intention to take the credit |
| 10 |
> myself, but I didn't want to look like a dunce on bugzilla, but I've |
| 11 |
> never submitted a feature request that didn't make me look like a |
| 12 |
> dunce, hence polling opinion here. |
| 13 |
> ... |
| 14 |
> https://www.prof-maad.org/blog/2009/11/11/transparent-alsamixer/ |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The first thing I would do is contact upstream (their -dev mailing |
| 17 |
list?) and ask if they're aware of the patch. If know about it, but |
| 18 |
refuse to integrate it they may be able to give a good reason. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Stroller. |
Archives