Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:43:06
Message-Id: CAA2qdGWLrN-A58MDjDSndY4uyhy4qg+QXHJQuxoaqO93ci1Oug@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package by "Sebastian Beßler"
1 Because I don't know Meino's arch ;)
2
3 Or, to be more precise, I have a common package.accept_keywords for
4 all my Gentoo systems, some of them x86 and others amd64, so it's a
5 habit of mine to unmask both :)
6
7 Rgds,
8
9
10 On 2011-08-30, Sebastian Beßler <sebastian@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
11 > Am 30.08.2011 09:15, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
12 >
13 >> Personally, I'd put '<=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r99 ~amd64 ~x86' in that
14 >> file. I have the conviction that versions with greater '-r' would be
15 >> better, since it's a revision to the same version.
16 >
17 > '~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88 ~amd64 ~x86' does the same as ~ matches on all
18 > '-r' of a specific version so in this case it matches everything from
19 > sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r1 to sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r999999 (and even above)
20 >
21 > Why unmask for two arches ~amd64 and ~x86?
22 >
23 > Greetings
24 >
25 > Sebastian
26 >
27 >
28
29
30 --
31 --
32 Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
33 My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Important package blocked by another important package Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>