1 |
On 31 October 2014 16:16:33 WET, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 31 October 2014 15:09:26 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I've got a few systems where grub1 doesn't work. This is more likely |
5 |
> caused |
6 |
> > by some changes in used filesystems instead of any other cause. |
7 |
> > If I really wanted to, I might get it to work, but I don't see the |
8 |
> point in |
9 |
> > spending time on this. |
10 |
> > Grub starts the boot process and then, afaik, disappears. |
11 |
> > Which is sufficient for me. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> My grub-0.99 lets me choose from four kernels and two or three run |
14 |
> levels at |
15 |
> boot time, and grub-2 can't handle this yet, or it couldn't the last |
16 |
> time I |
17 |
> checked. I don't suggest that everyone has a similar need, but at |
18 |
> least in |
19 |
> some cases the old grub does still have a place. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> -- |
22 |
> Rgds |
23 |
> Peter |
24 |
|
25 |
Grub2 can do that in at least three different ways. You can write a complete manual configuration, just like with 0.9,you can put a manual custom configuration in /etc/grub.d or you can put a simple she'll script in that directory that creates menu entries with each set of options for each kernel in /boot. |
26 |
|
27 |
None of these options are any more complex than creating a grub 0 configuration by hand. |
28 |
-- |
29 |
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |