1 |
Le 01 juin à 20:57:49 "Boris Fersing" <kernelsensei@g.o> écrit notamment: |
2 |
|
3 |
| 2006/6/1, Jean Magnan de Bornier <jean@×××××××.net>: |
4 |
| > Hi all, |
5 |
| > |
6 |
| > Using eix for some time (at least a year now), I discovered today |
7 |
| > (eix-0.5.5) a very strange feature which and in less perfect world than |
8 |
| > gentoo's might perhaps qualify as a bug. |
9 |
| > |
10 |
| > If I type "eix <package>" and the package is unstable (or has unstable |
11 |
| > versions) and appears as such in the gentoo database, I expect to see it |
12 |
| > -for the unstable versions- in eix's output: the man page says so anyway; |
13 |
| > but this happens only if I have not marked the package with "~x86" in *my* |
14 |
| > /etc/portage/package.keywords file. If I mark the package (with "~x86") |
15 |
| > eix tells me : |
16 |
| > |
17 |
| > * app-editors/emacs-cvs |
18 |
| > Available versions: 22.0.50-r1 22.0.50-r2 [M]23.0.0 |
19 |
| > Installed: 22.0.50-r2 |
20 |
| > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs |
21 |
| > Description: Emacs is the extensible, customizable, |
22 |
| > self-documenting real-time display editor. |
23 |
| > |
24 |
| > and this is a *big lie* (works with any package apparently). |
25 |
| > |
26 |
| > Or is it intended? |
27 |
> |
28 |
| Hi, |
29 |
> |
30 |
| add LOCAL_PORTAGE_CONFIG=false in /etc/eixrc and try again ! (it's not |
31 |
| a bug, it's a feature ! :D) |
32 |
> |
33 |
Thanks Boris for the explanation, I hadn't noticed; not sure this should be the |
34 |
default feature though... |
35 |
|
36 |
cheers |
37 |
-- |
38 |
Jean |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |