| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2020, 18:45:12 CET schrieb Ian Zimmerman: |
| 2 |
> On 2020-02-06 09:56, Mick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, so your links above look |
| 4 |
> > correct as far as I can tell. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Note that sci-libs/lapack and sci-libs/lapack-reference are 2 distinct |
| 7 |
> packages. The OP presumably has the latter. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Both of them existing may be the real bug here. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You motivated me to look this up on my system, and I don't think that's right: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- octave depends on virtual/lapack, and |
| 14 |
- virtual/lapack does *not* depend on lapack-reference: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
RDEPEND=" |
| 17 |
>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso?] |
| 18 |
eselect-ldso? ( || ( |
| 19 |
>=sci-libs/lapack-3.8.0[eselect-ldso] |
| 20 |
sci-libs/openblas[eselect-ldso] ) ) |
| 21 |
" |
| 22 |
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}" |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Note also that lapack-reference has no eselect-ldso USE flag, which Karl |
| 25 |
changed as per one of his other emails. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Karl, what exactly is the error message you get? Can you find anything |
| 28 |
related on bugs.gentoo.org? FWIW, my octave installation starts just fine, |
| 29 |
but I use openblas: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
% eselect lapack list |
| 32 |
Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
| 33 |
(none found) |
| 34 |
Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
| 35 |
[1] openblas * |
| 36 |
[2] reference |
| 37 |
% eselect blas list |
| 38 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
| 39 |
(none found) |
| 40 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
| 41 |
[1] openblas * |
| 42 |
[2] reference |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
HTH |
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
Marc Joliet |
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 49 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives