| 1 |
On 09/05/12 23:10, Doug Hunley wrote: |
| 2 |
> My SB Live! 5.1 sang its last note finally, so I'm reverting to the |
| 3 |
> onboard Intel chip. I got my kernel configured already, but when I |
| 4 |
> went to edit make.conf, I became confused on which of the following is |
| 5 |
> correct: |
| 6 |
> ALSA_CARDS="snd-hda-intel" |
| 7 |
> or |
| 8 |
> ALSA_CARDS="hda-intel" |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I googled it and, of course, found examples for both :-/ |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I then used 'eix/' to check the alsa packages and didn't see either form. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Which is correct? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> On a side note, is it even needed since I run a monolithic kernel? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It's not needed. It's also not needed when building sound drivers as |
| 19 |
modules. AFAIK, ALSA_CARDS serves no purpose anymore, since it was used |
| 20 |
to control the drivers that were built by the alsa-driver ebuild. The |
| 21 |
alsa-driver package has been removed from portage. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You can simply delete ALSA_CARDS from make.conf. |
Archives