| 1 |
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:58 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 11.05.2010 03:58, schrieb Bill Kenworthy: |
| 3 |
> > Saw the news announcement that gnome 2.28 is stabilized - however |
| 4 |
> > looking at the header of gnome-base/gnome-2.28.2 (only 2.28 ebuild |
| 5 |
> > present) still shows ~x86 - do I have update problems or are there |
| 6 |
> > delays? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Is this for amd64 only or has x86 just been overlooked? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The stabilization for AMD64 happened between last Tuesday and Wednesday, |
| 12 |
> according to my observations. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Thats the question I am asking - whats happened to x86? - did it get |
| 16 |
forgotten? - the news message says nothing about it being amd64 only ... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Looking at the changelog and bug for it, it seems amd64 got in early, |
| 19 |
and the x86 team have not caught up yet - but as its been a full week is |
| 20 |
there a reason not listed in the changelog/bug why x86 hasnt gone stable |
| 21 |
when bug #314899 asks: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
------- Comment #31 From Pacho Ramos 2010-05-02 13:54:51 0000 [reply] |
| 25 |
------- |
| 26 |
Arches, please test and mark stable Gnome 2.28 following GNOME 2.28 |
| 27 |
stabilization list pass #8 (last one) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
You can move down the list incrementally stabilizing things; but each block |
| 30 |
*should* ideally be finished in one go. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Thanks a lot |
| 33 |
------- Comment |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Note I am not hassling for the sake of it but I like to run stable if |
| 38 |
possible, but I am at a point with evolution where I want 2.28 or 2.30 |
| 39 |
for exchange access so do I upgrade gnome to ~x86 (and work out any |
| 40 |
kinks that will involve), do evolution only or wait? Its just being |
| 41 |
caught in limbo that answer will help resolve which way I go. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
BillK |
Archives