| 1 |
On Sunday 29 October 2006 17:05, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I consider "Super eye-candy interface" and "Funky visualisations" as |
| 5 |
> insults against a program. The amarok website is ***BRAGGING*** about |
| 6 |
> them. I am obviously not their target market. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
both is OPTIONAL. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
without xmms/libvisual, there is no eye-candy. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > Amarok is not a replacement, amarok is an alternative, which is |
| 14 |
> > exactly what this thread is about. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Amarok brings along a lot of excess baggage compared to xmms. At some |
| 17 |
> point, it crosses the line of being too much. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
again, a lot of the stuff is optional. And the fact, that it has a |
| 20 |
dcop-interface, make it possible, to control it with scripts or from a |
| 21 |
command line. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives