| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:59:56 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Yea, it used to be recommended and in a way it can still be a good |
| 5 |
>> idea. I use LVM for example and I can increase /usr, /var, /home or |
| 6 |
>> whatever without having to redo my drive setup. The only thing I can't |
| 7 |
>> change is / which is a regular file system. Just have to cross that |
| 8 |
>> bridge when I get there. |
| 9 |
> You can put / on LVM too, but then you'll need an init-thingy and I don't |
| 10 |
> think any of us want to go there ;-) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yea, keep in mind, I didn't want a init thingy at all. Thing is, I had |
| 16 |
already set up my partitions when that requirement came along. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In a way, I'd either like to have everything on LVM or BTRFS or nothing |
| 19 |
but /home on one of those. In other words, if I have to have a init |
| 20 |
thingy, everything is where I can shrink/expand as needed or if no init |
| 21 |
thingy then all those are on a regular file system. Likely going with |
| 22 |
the later next time around. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Maybe by then BTRFS will be 100% ready to go then. ;-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
Archives