| 1 |
On 2/4/08, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Monday 04 February 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Why is gaim no longer in portage? Is it dead upstream? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > It has been renamed to Pidgin in 2007 to prevent some legal |
| 8 |
> > issues with AOL and their AIM product. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> From Michael Sullivan's comment shall I assume that you also did not see |
| 11 |
> the |
| 12 |
> portage warning about Gaim-over (pun intended) or perhaps you never had |
| 13 |
> Gaim |
| 14 |
> installed? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Anyone else who can confirm that they have Gaim installed but not seen the |
| 17 |
> portage warning? |
| 18 |
> -- |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I can; and I'm the OP. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't know where the warning would have been seen; generally there's so |
| 24 |
much stuff |
| 25 |
that any particular item has to really push to be noticed. But at that |
| 26 |
time, all ewarn and einfo |
| 27 |
messages were being mailed to me, but I don't remember seeing this. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
++ kevin |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD |
Archives