Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] screen, screen+byobu, or tmux?
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:10:04
Message-Id: 37585163-F643-419A-AF60-4EA85CD291E2@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] screen, screen+byobu, or tmux? by Pandu Poluan
1 On 17/4/2011, at 5:39am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
2
3 > So, anyone got any experience using screen and screen+byobu and tmux?
4
5 tmux, as discussed here at length in the past.
6
7 Useful features include [1].
8
9 Because tmux is a single server daemon and you can run tmux commands from both inside and outside of it, without needing to go into "command mode", you can do useful things like:
10
11 for host in server1 server2 server3
12 do
13 tmux new-window -d "ssh $host"
14 done
15
16 Then using `tmux synchronize-panes on` you can `emerge -pv world` (or whatever) to all hosts.
17
18 This is just one example. Maybe you need italics support, or something else instead. tmux is better than screen lots of minor ways, that are cumulatively significant IMO.
19
20 tmux "doesn't need" byobu because it's better than screen in the first place, although it does need some customisation, IMO (see attached). If you have a window manager that provides a clock, then having it also in your screen / tmux status line is just a distraction and a waste of space; likewise CPU meters are always so, IMO.
21
22 Stroller.
23
24
25
26 [1] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20110417043659.GA10986%40carbon.vonhaugwitz.com&forum_name=tmux-users

Attachments

File name MIME type
tmux.conf application/octet-stream