| 1 |
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Hi, |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage |
| 7 |
> >> has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When |
| 8 |
> >> did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > yes. They merged the '386' and the amd64/x86_64 architecture into x86. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > And it happend a couple of kernel versions ago. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> OK. At least I ain't going crazy. Whew, that was close. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> >> I'm just wanting to make sure I am not going to blow up something when I |
| 17 |
> >> boot that thing. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > why do you care anyway? Just install debianutils and use make install. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I like to copy mine manually. I dunno, I just do. I'm weird that way. |
| 22 |
> I also have a unique way of naming my kernels so I can keep up with |
| 23 |
> which is which. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
well, you can always put the name in the config - and let make install do the |
| 26 |
copy. That way you get a nice vmlinuz symlink to the latest kernel and |
| 27 |
vmlinuz.old to the older one - and you never have to touch grub.conf again. |
Archives