Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ryan Sims <rwsims@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:56:31
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation by Steen Eugen Poulsen
1 On 8/31/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <sep@×××××××××.net> wrote:
2 > an idiot using it wrong.
3 > so viciously done in this thread is nothing but FUD.
4 > change is great that it sucks again in the future. Plus it doesn't really make things easier, does it?
5 > All the rest of his hate drivel ... made up FUD
6 > you see this hate FUD being spread all
8 Please stop using inflammatory language. Everyone. If you must have
9 an argument, start a new thread or take it off list. It's perfectly
10 fine for someone to criticize genkernel, or portage, or a hammer, or a
11 car, or any other tool. It's also fine if you disagree with their
12 criticisms, that's what's so great about a diverse community like
13 gentoo; so many viewpoints. Daniels reply to your post is well said,
14 and a perfectly valid objection to Volker's crticism, words like
15 "hate" "drivel" "FUD" and such are *not*.
17 The authors deserve intelligent feedback on their creations, which can
18 be negative, but not inflammatory. It *really* isn't worth calling
19 each other names, so PLEASE STOP.
21 --
22 Ryan W Sims
23 --
24 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation Steen Eugen Poulsen <sep@×××××××××.net>