Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Florian Philipp <f.philipp@××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No torrent upload
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:43:10
Message-Id: 200706122137.19844.f.philipp@addcom.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] No torrent upload by Albert Hopkins
1 Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 21:25 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
2 > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 20:09 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
3 > > dsl@HOMER_GENTOO64 ~ $ sudo tcpdump -vvns 1600 dst port 21
4 > > Password:
5 > > tcpdump: listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
6 > > 1600
7 > > bytes
8 > > 18:37:12.543965 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 64, id 27970, offset 0, flags [DF],
9 > > proto:
10 > > TCP (6), length: 60) 192.168.1.2.45269 > 89.57.3.60.21: S, cksum
11 > > 0x8013
12 > > (correct), 1866573467:1866573467(0) win 5840 <mss
13 > > 1460,sackOK,timestamp
14 > > 6212569 0,nop,wscale 5>
15 > > 18:37:12.544426 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 64, id 17977, offset 0, flags [DF],
16 > > proto:
17 > > TCP (6), length: 60) 192.168.1.2.45288 > 89.57.3.60.21: S, cksum
18 > > 0x98ab
19 > > (correct), 1867615712:1867615712(0) win 5840 <mss
20 > > 1460,sackOK,timestamp
21 > > 6212569 0,nop,wscale 5>
22 > > 19:07:52.537852 IP (tos 0x8, ttl 64, id 17709, offset 0, flags [DF],
23 > > proto:
24 > > TCP (6), length: 60) 192.168.1.2.36423 > 89.57.3.60.21: S, cksum
25 > > 0x3a4e
26 > > (correct), 3820262832:3820262832(0) win 5840 <mss
27 > > 1460,sackOK,timestamp
28 > > 6672541 0,nop,wscale 5>
29 > > [...]
30 > > 27 packets captured
31 > > 54 packets received by filter
32 > > 0 packets dropped by kernel
33 >
34 > It's been a while since I looked at tcpdump, but this looks like
35 > yourself connecting *to* an FTP server (or I should say an external
36 > connection on port 21).
37 >
38 > > In the past Tiscali (my ISP) did not stop file sharing, they just
39 > > slowed it
40 > > down to 10-12k.
41 >
42 > But they don't slow down FTP? FTP *is* (client/server) file sharing.
43 >
44 > --
45 > Albert W. Hopkins
46
47 It seems they try to recognize some kind of signature/footprint/whatever which
48 is typical for file sharing. Apparently they don't check ports that are
49 heavily used due to performance issues or false positives.