| 1 |
On Freitag 02 April 2010, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:45:29 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > seriously lvm sounds nice. But it isn't. It easily breaks. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Do you have something to back that up? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > You want a save setup? Go raid5 or raid6. As a bonus - you can get more |
| 8 |
> > space if you need it by just adding another disk. And you are not |
| 9 |
> > depending on some complex stuff to get it working. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> LVM and RAID are completely different animals. No one suggested using it |
| 12 |
> for any reasons of data security, running LVM on a RAID array gives both |
| 13 |
> security and flexibility. As for being able to add space to RAID, you |
| 14 |
> can't temporarily add a new volume whenever you want, you have to go out |
| 15 |
> and buy another drive, then power down the computer to fit it, assuming |
| 16 |
> there is room in the case for an extra drive. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
no need to power down - and you can add and remove drives. Read man mdadm. |
Archives