| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have been up and running a while and am running stable but this is |
| 5 |
> Gentoo. ;) I found a script that tells you what your CFLAGS are |
| 6 |
> suposed to be and it is different from what I am using. This is what I |
| 7 |
> am using now, from make.conf of course: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>>CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This is what the script said: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>>-march=athlon-xp -mfpmath=sse -msse -mmmx -m3dnow |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I assume I would have to add the-O3 to that though. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I have a AMD XP 2500+ and 1GB of ram. I like it to run fast even if it |
| 24 |
> takes longer to compile. I think that is where the -O3 comes in but be |
| 25 |
> gentle if I am wrong. For those who may read this and not tell the |
| 26 |
> difference, that is a minus sign, the letter O and the number three. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> What do you folks think? Is the one I am using better or the one it |
| 29 |
> says? I do have long uptimes so I do want to stay stable. I have went |
| 30 |
> as long as 9 months with no reboot. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Thanks. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Dale |
| 35 |
> :-) |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Well, it looks pretty much like my CLAFGS: |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -msse |
| 42 |
-mmmx -m3dnow -pipe" (the same I used with LFS). |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
The difference being -O2 instead of -O3. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
I don't think you'll gain much with the new CFLAGS, but they won't hurt |
| 47 |
stability. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-Kristian Poul Herkild |
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives