1 |
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/29/08, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Anyone have any recommendations of something in portage. (Or not in |
4 |
>> portage?) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Wikipedia has some, they've even tried to categorize a bit and made |
7 |
> some tables of the basic features: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_genealogy_software |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> I found gramps in portage. I did not find Lifelines. I haven't |
12 |
>> uncovered any other project names as yet. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I set up my sister's old Ubuntu box to have gramps installed and (what |
15 |
> I've heard) she has been using it successfully for her intermittent |
16 |
> lightweight hobby genealogy studies of our relatives from previous |
17 |
> centuries. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I don't actually know much about these genealogy systems, so I don't |
20 |
> know if such light-weight use is what you have in mind -- and whether |
21 |
> gramps is a major beast or only usable for this kind of "playtoy-use". |
22 |
> |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> Arttu V. |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks. I appreciate the responses. |
27 |
|
28 |
For what I've seen so far gramps looks like it might be the best for a |
29 |
really casual Linux user and it's likely my wife will start with that. |
30 |
The sort of bigger issue is once you've got your tree put together, as |
31 |
best you know it, then linking it up with other trees from other folks |
32 |
you don't know is a really valuable thing to do. The commercial |
33 |
software guys, like Family Tree Maker, have huge contributed databases |
34 |
of family trees submitted by other FTM customers. It's sort of a |
35 |
racket but you can subscribe to their service and then work to link |
36 |
yourself up with other groups from your extended family if they have |
37 |
made contributions. I'm told the problem is you don't really know if |
38 |
there's anything in their database until you start paying but you can |
39 |
do it for a month or two just to see how it works out. It seems that |
40 |
gramps is doing something sort of like this but one wonders just how |
41 |
large their database is. Also, I'd hate for my wife to do a lot of |
42 |
work entering a few hundred people only to find she cannot use the |
43 |
gramps data with anything but gramps. |
44 |
|
45 |
Might be best just to pay the money and take our chance with FTM |
46 |
longer-term but maybe she'll like playing with gramps on her Linux |
47 |
machine. It's really up to her. I'm just her sys-admin. |
48 |
|
49 |
Cheers, |
50 |
Mark |