Archives
Archives
| From: | Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:36:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | j9ubb9$1ko$1@dough.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)? by Michael Mol |
||
| 1 | Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Isn't there a kernelland HTTP server? ISTR seeing the option. I don't |
| 4 | > know anything about it, though. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | Yeah there was; as I recall it got removed a while back. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Google got me: |
| 9 | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TUX_web_server |
| 10 | and khttpd at: http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ |
| 11 | |
| 12 | ..both of which appear dead. I couldn't find any mention of http in my |
| 13 | kernel config either. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | We use lighttpd for our dev stuff; I guess it's that, nginx or thttpd, |
| 16 | last of which doesn't do fastCGI, so might be the best for this |
| 17 | purpose. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_server_software |
| 20 | ..might prove helpful. |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | #friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |