1 |
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Joerg Schilling |
2 |
<Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but |
6 |
>> let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information |
7 |
>> for the following events in chronological order: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Please explain why you don't read the FAQ? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> All your questions are answered in the FAQ. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> If you don't read the available information, it seems that you like to |
14 |
> turn this thread into a thread where you spread your FUD. |
15 |
|
16 |
The FAQ (I assume you're talking about |
17 |
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html ) only contain |
18 |
basic information on your side, almost without a single reference that |
19 |
shows me the actual full text of the email exchanges etc. supporting |
20 |
what you say. The FAQ is not in chronological order and it is even |
21 |
self-contradicting in chronological details (e.g. it starts with "In |
22 |
autumn 2005 and early spring 2006, a group of Debian maintainers |
23 |
started to attack the cdrtools project. The attacks have been based on |
24 |
the fact that cdrtools was licensed under the GPL. " then, in the |
25 |
final part of the document, you talk about the UTF story: " In fact, |
26 |
this happened around y2004 [...] Now these people have been in trouble |
27 |
and needed an excuse for their behavior." -from this it seems implicit |
28 |
the problems started in 2004). Only explanation you give for all what |
29 |
was happening is a commercial-distributions-are-evil conspiracy theory |
30 |
(which maybe is true, but I am again waiting for evidence -the theory |
31 |
is quite weak, since forking an essential desktop software seems *much |
32 |
worse* than rewriting UTF8 support, and they could have inserted their |
33 |
unofficial patch into their packages even if you refused it upstream, |
34 |
if they felt their UTF8 patch was important). |
35 |
|
36 |
Anyway, I'm sure you can fix the FAQ and provide the full disclosed |
37 |
evidence, and everyone will be happier. |
38 |
|
39 |
m. |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |