1 |
On 4/30/07, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Montag, 30. April 2007, Holla wrote: |
3 |
> > Hello, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I would like to install my own version of the kernel (2.6.18.3) |
6 |
> > which i have compiled and installed. This is working fine. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > But when I try to do 'emerge system', portage is |
9 |
> > trying to emerge linux-headers also. How can I prevent |
10 |
> > it ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> why? Why do you want to prevent it? |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
OK, I get it now. I was under the (wrong) impression that |
16 |
the kernel headers should match the kernel installed. |
17 |
So, if portage is trying to install linux-headers-2.6.17 |
18 |
it is because that is the stable headers for 2.6, right ? |
19 |
|
20 |
I even went to the extent of doing a |
21 |
make headers_check |
22 |
export INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr |
23 |
make headers_install |
24 |
|
25 |
in the kernel build directory. |
26 |
|
27 |
I see this is stupid now.. |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks |
30 |
sathish |
31 |
|
32 |
> You know, that the in-kernel headers should not be used? |
33 |
> |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > Also , when using a homebrew source, how do I install |
36 |
> > the linux-headers in /usr/include ? just copy the directory |
37 |
> > from the kerenl source, or symlink it ? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> You don't. Really. The kernel headers which come with the source tarball are |
40 |
> not a good choice for userspace. Don't do it, you don't have a compelling |
41 |
> reason. And if you have a very good reason for the in-kernel headers (like |
42 |
> app X needs them), it is a bug. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> -- |
45 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |