| 1 |
On Sat, 01 Jun 2019 09:05:08 +0100 |
| 2 |
Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Friday, 31 May 2019 14:59:59 BST Jack wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > It's perfectly OK for there to still be stuff under /lib /usr/lib |
| 7 |
> > /usr/local/lib. These are supposed to be things which are arch |
| 8 |
> > independent, such as config stuff and scripts. However, I'm pretty |
| 9 |
> > sure none of them should still be a symlink. What's the link |
| 10 |
> > pointing to? I'd be tempted to revert the unsymlink. Did you check |
| 11 |
> > the output of "unsymlink-lib --analyze" first? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> After a pause for thought (quite a long one, with coffee), I went |
| 14 |
> through the process again and all has turned out just fine. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I've very glad to read this, since it was my post which encouraged (I |
| 17 |
didn't mean to!) you to take the plunge. I hope no problems pop up for |
| 18 |
you, but in case you notice anything screwy, there's a tracker bug at |
| 19 |
<https://bugs.gentoo.org/506276>. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> I'm impressed at the success of such a complex upgrade. Well done, |
| 22 |
> team! |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+1 |
Archives