| 1 |
On 2017-12-31 00:33, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> But the whole 4.12 branch has been masked, so that won't do. Here, |
| 4 |
> I've had to go back to 4.9.49-r1 (amd64, not ~amd64). But now I see |
| 5 |
> 4.9.72 has been stabilised. I think I'll wait for some stabiliity in |
| 6 |
> the kernel version offerings before I make another move. Three kernel |
| 7 |
> compilations on six systems within a week are a few too many. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
FWIW, I find 4.9.73 (upstream, not gentoo) rock solid. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, |
| 13 |
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. |
| 14 |
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain. |
Archives