| 1 |
Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 2 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 17:39:06 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> Out of curiosity I made some tests which confirmed my expectations. What |
| 9 |
>>> about you - did you have time (and wish) to take some performance |
| 10 |
>>> benchmarks? I would be glad to see some additional results. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> So your tests show that RAID-0 is faster than LVM, but I'll be using LVM |
| 14 |
>> anyway so the comparison will have to be between LVM+RAID and LVM alone. |
| 15 |
>> I haven't had a chance to do this yet, hopefully over the holiday weekend. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> OK |
| 22 |
> I still have that free space and I'll post the results of the same test |
| 23 |
> against RAID0+LVM. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Here we go. I think the results can't be interpreted unambiguously. |
| 28 |
Perhaps I'll use a benchmarking program in the weekend to get clearer |
| 29 |
results. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Best regards, |
| 33 |
Daniel |
Archives