| 1 |
That seems interesting. Do we need to include Portage install prefix (/var/tmp/portage/category/package/..., the image path prefix before actually merging with /)? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Regards, |
| 4 |
-- |
| 5 |
Pengcheng Xu |
| 6 |
https://jsteward.moe |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> -----Original Message----- |
| 9 |
> From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| 10 |
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:07 PM |
| 11 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 12 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Building packages in different prefix without |
| 13 |
> rebuilding system packages |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 16:46:58 +0800, Pengcheng Xu wrote: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > What you're trying to achieve sounded a lot like `./configure |
| 18 |
> > --prefix=...` to me. If you're just dealing a small amount of things, |
| 19 |
> > I would suggest modifying the ebuild (in a local overlay) and changes |
| 20 |
> > where the program installs to. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> You may be able to avoid modifying ebuilds by setting the --prefix option in |
| 23 |
> $EXTRA_ECONF. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Neil Bothwick |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Top Oxymorons Number 8: Tight slacks |
Archives