| 1 |
On 2010-07-02, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:19:36 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Not really. The OP's choice of mail client isn't going to change |
| 5 |
>> what happens when people reply to his postings. He wants "reply-to" |
| 6 |
>> to contain his address as well as the list address so that he gets a |
| 7 |
>> direct response and doesn't have to bother to check the mailing list |
| 8 |
>> for replies. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> So he wants other people to take the trouble to reply, but he won't take |
| 11 |
> the trouble to look for the replies? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's the way it read to me. If that's not what the OP meant, then I |
| 14 |
apologize for misunderstanding what he wrote. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> If he really finds it so difficult to look for replies to his mails |
| 17 |
> (some mailers will highlight them), he could always set up a filter |
| 18 |
> to copy replies to him to his mailbox. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yup. Since the mailing list is already sending him a reply, why he |
| 21 |
wants a second one is beyond me. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> You don't always need everyone else to change to get what you want. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Well, I know some people who are like that... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Grant |
Archives