| 1 |
On 2012-10-08, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:49:33 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> But seriously, like the other suggested, I would mask that specific |
| 6 |
>> version of emacs. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Emacs is slotted, so you can mask the entire 24 range if you want with |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> app-editors/emacs:24 |
| 11 |
> virtual/emacs:24 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Actually, you should be able to mask just the virtual, because everything |
| 14 |
> that needs emacs should depend on the virtual, not a particular |
| 15 |
> implementation. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
But if one uses emacs as their main text editor, I suppose something |
| 18 |
will be in the world file, and *that* should be a specific |
| 19 |
implementation, not virtual/*, right? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
| 23 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |
Archives