| 1 |
J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update |
| 4 |
>> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest |
| 5 |
>> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to |
| 6 |
>> override the portage checksums and say install anyway? Because this |
| 7 |
>> package always fails anyway, I cant see any security gain by having a |
| 8 |
>> manual update every-time anyway. |
| 9 |
> I would be more interested in finding out why it fails? |
| 10 |
> I use adobe flash myself and never experience a checksum issue with it. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -- |
| 13 |
> Joost |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> . |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Same here. I have it installed here and don't recall ever having a |
| 19 |
digest issue. It could be that something is off somewhere. If so, I'd |
| 20 |
rethink bypassing the checks. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Dale |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
:-) :-) |
Archives