| 1 |
On 29/09/2013 23:32, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:23:20 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Here's my version of "LVM without the overhead of LVM" to allow |
| 5 |
>> maximum flexibity, without the overhead of LVM. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This gives you one of the advantages of LVM, the ability to use space on |
| 8 |
> a single drive as your needs change. It doesn't allow you t use multiple |
| 9 |
> drives, use different filesystems or filesystem options for different |
| 10 |
> mount points, prevent one filesystem from stealing space from another |
| 11 |
> (although you can do this with quotas) or use snapshots. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
<thread_derail> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And it also prevents him from using The One True Filesystem That Will |
| 19 |
Rule Them All and In the Darkness Bind Them: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
ZFS |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
</thread_derail> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 27 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives