From: | Sid S <r030t1@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMs - what technology would you advise? | ||
Date: | Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:48:02 | ||
Message-Id: | CAAD4mYiwogfAc5jpgTk9frU5jYtmRbrxpskBFL-we7T5_3GNvQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] VMs - what technology would you advise? by Mick |
1 | Yes, in favor of KVM. |
2 | |
3 | http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_haswell_virtualization |
4 | http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1404_kvmboxt |
5 | |
6 | On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
7 | > On Wednesday 31 Dec 2014 07:32:18 Sid S wrote: |
8 | >> I would suggest QEMU/KVM takes the place of VirtualBox. I've not |
9 | >> actually found anything it doesn't support, though VirtualBox is far |
10 | >> more polished. |
11 | >> |
12 | >> Starting a VM will be as easy as running a shell script (or you can |
13 | >> use virt-manager). |
14 | > |
15 | > Thanks Sid, other than the GUI and potential ease of use, is there a |
16 | > difference in performance between Vbox and KVM? |
17 | > |
18 | > -- |
19 | > Regards, |
20 | > Mick |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] VMs - what technology would you advise? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |