From: | Uwe Klosa <uwe.klosa@×××××.se> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | ||
Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:06:58 | ||
Message-Id: | 438DBEBD.1050409@ub.uu.se | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary by Joseph |
1 | Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean |
2 | install with the source code version. |
3 | |
4 | Uwe |
5 | |
6 | Joseph wrote: |
7 | > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 09:00 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote: |
8 | > |
9 | >>I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my system. |
10 | >> |
11 | >>Uwe |
12 | > |
13 | > |
14 | > [snip] |
15 | > |
16 | > I've compile OO 2.0 without any errors. |
17 | > But when I just open and save a spreadsheet OO 2.0 crashed on me with |
18 | > [signal.11]. |
19 | > Not a good symptom. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
uwe.klosa.vcf | text/x-vcard |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary | Joseph <syscon@×××××××××.com> |