Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker.
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:57:49
Message-Id: CA+czFiB3nvcUTUh7-LRapQ0v_OHWTnL=S=AY5k__XYNXvvO0Cw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. by Dmitry Goncharov
1 On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Dmitry Goncharov
2 <dgoncharov@××××××××.net> wrote:
3 > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:52:12PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
4 >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >> Wow. Just wow. This is incredible.
6 >>
7 >> This is repeatable for me.
8 >>
9 > <snip>
10 >>  * The problem occurred while executing the ebuild file named
11 >>  * 'glibc-2.14.1-r3.ebuild' located in the '/var/db/pkg/sys-
12 >>
13 > <snip>
14 >> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf
15 >> --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param
16 >> l2-cache-size=4096 -mtune=core2 -ggdb3"
17 >> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
18 >
19 > Can you upgrage to glibc-2.15?
20
21 Sure. It's going to be another full reinstall.
22
23 > Can you tweak you gcc flags to something more conventional and see if the
24 > problem persists?
25
26 Those CFLAGS should be equivalent to:
27 CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -ggdb3 --march=native".
28
29 But I'll try making it just -O2 -pipe --march=native.
30
31 > If you are interested in submitting a patch to the upstream then you can build
32 > the glibc test suite with your gcc flags and check if the tests pass.
33
34 If it gets things fixed. I have two machines which have been offline
35 for almost two months from this.
36
37 --
38 :wq

Replies