1 |
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:45:20 +0200, b.n. wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> >> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.3 (masked by: package.mask) |
4 |
> >> /usr/portage/local/layman/desktop-effects/profiles/package.mask: |
5 |
> >> # |
6 |
> >> # <jmbsviceto@g.o> (9 February 2008) |
7 |
> >> # glib-2.15 breaks some packages |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.2 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword) |
10 |
> >> - dev-libs/glib-2.16.1 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword) |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man |
13 |
> >> page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
14 |
> >> (dependency required by "dev-cpp/glibmm-2.16.1" [ebuild]) |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Sync again, glib-2.16.3 is not masked in the profile here. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Synced and nothing changed. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Where should I look for? I have no package.mask in /etc/portage. |
22 |
|
23 |
I've just read the message more carefully and seen the problem, I only |
24 |
noticed the profiles/package.mask part, meaning it is masked in your |
25 |
profile, not /etc/portage, and didn't look carefully at the full path. |
26 |
|
27 |
This is masked in a profile from the desktop-effects overlay. It's |
28 |
nothing to do with the official portage tree, but a third-party overlay |
29 |
breaking things for you. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Neil Bothwick |
34 |
|
35 |
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny? |