1 |
tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/11 05:55, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:49:01 -0500, Jack wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>>> package.use/inkscape:media-gfx/inkscape jpeg nls openmp cdr dbus dia |
6 |
>>>> exif -gnome imagemagick inkjar latex lcms postscript visio wpg |
7 |
>>>> PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7") |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> Cheers! |
11 |
>>>> mcc |
12 |
>>> I'm curious why you have the PYTHON_TARGET set for imagemagick. I |
13 |
>>> don't see any mention of python anywhere in any of the imagemagick |
14 |
>>> ebuilds, and "emerge -p imagemagick" doesn't say anything about python. |
15 |
>> He doesn't, it is set for inkscape. However, that trailing ) shouldn't be |
16 |
>> there. I doubt it is the cause of the problem, but it's worth cleaning up |
17 |
>> anyway. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> -- |
21 |
>> Neil Bothwick |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> WinErr 683: Time out error - Operator fell asleep while waiting for the |
24 |
>> system to complete boot procedure. |
25 |
> I removed the ')' and updated again (did this aboyt 2h before). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> The onlu one, which ich being emerged is imagemagick... |
28 |
> |
29 |
> But I saw this again: |
30 |
> |
31 |
> WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> media-gfx/imagemagick:0 |
34 |
> |
35 |
> (media-gfx/imagemagick-7.0.9.7:0/7.0.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with |
36 |
> <media-gfx/imagemagick-7:0/6.9.10.77=[cxx] required by (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta2:0/0::gentoo, installed) |
37 |
> ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
38 |
> <media-gfx/imagemagick-7:=[cxx] required by (media-gfx/inkscape-1.0_beta2:0/0::gentoo, installed) |
39 |
> ^ ^ |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Cheers! |
42 |
> mcc |
43 |
> |
44 |
|
45 |
I vaguely remember seeing this. I couldn't recall the fix so I went |
46 |
digging. I found this: |
47 |
|
48 |
/etc/portage/package.use/package.use:media-gfx/imagemagick cxx |
49 |
|
50 |
It seems I added the cxx USE flag for that package to correct the |
51 |
problem. Might be worth a try. |
52 |
|
53 |
Hope that helps. |
54 |
|
55 |
Dale |
56 |
|
57 |
:-) :-) |