| 1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:49:39 Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 15 Sep, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>> To completely get rid of libxcb-xlib.so references, please read : |
| 9 |
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/libxcb-1.4-upgrade-guide.xml |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> Since my browser got broken, too, this took some time. |
| 12 |
>> And following that advice takes even much more time, since |
| 13 |
>> I have to rebuild half of my system. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Luckily it has 4 cores, |
| 16 |
>> Helmut. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> The gods must be favouring me for a change. I'm completely unaffected by this |
| 21 |
> upgrade :-) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> $ sudo /var/portage/x11-libs/libxcb/files/xcb-rebuilder.sh |
| 24 |
> Password: |
| 25 |
> * Fixing broken libtool archives (.la) |
| 26 |
> * Scanning for libraries requiring libxcb-xlib.so... |
| 27 |
> * No broken libraries detected |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I wonder what I did different? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
Same here, no breakage on my laptop or desktop. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I have used dev-util/lafilefixer few time with "--justfixit" option |
| 35 |
few times,could that be the reason for smooth upgrade? |
Archives