| 1 |
Erik wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico skrev: |
| 3 |
>> Erik wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > I did "emerge --update --deep --newuse world" and it says: |
| 5 |
>> > Calculating world dependencies... done! |
| 6 |
>> >>>> Auto-cleaning packages... |
| 7 |
>> >>>> No outdated packages were found on your system. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> > But it seems like it is wrong about "No outdated packages were |
| 10 |
>> found on |
| 11 |
>> > your system.", because when I run "emerge -p world" it says: |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> > Calculating world dependencies... done! |
| 16 |
>> > [ebuild U ] media-gfx/digikam-0.9.2 [0.9.1] LINGUAS="-fa% -nds%" |
| 17 |
>> > [blocks B ] media-plugins/digikamimageplugins (is blocking |
| 18 |
>> > media-gfx/digikam-0.9.2) |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> > So it seems like media-gfx/digikam is outdated despite what "emerge |
| 22 |
>> > --update --deep --newuse world" said. I just wonder how much sense |
| 23 |
>> this |
| 24 |
>> > behaviour makes. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> It seems like something that you have installed depends on |
| 28 |
>> digikam-0-9.1 so the deep world update pulled that in instead of the |
| 29 |
>> new version. You can use the --debug option if you want to examine |
| 30 |
>> the dependency strings to see which package pulled in the lower version. |
| 31 |
> That package depending on digikam-0.9.1 would be digikamimageplugins. |
| 32 |
The output of emerge indicates that digikam-0.9.2 cannot be installed |
| 33 |
because you have digikamimageplugins installed. In this case, this is |
| 34 |
because the plugins have been merged into digikam itself ( see |
| 35 |
http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/DigikamImagePlugins?content=16082 |
| 36 |
), so you can simply unmerge digikamimageplugins and rerun the update. |
| 37 |
Blocks can usually be resolved by unmerging an offending package. Do |
| 38 |
that with care, however, or you'll do something like the OP of the |
| 39 |
recent 'emerge can not work !' thread :-) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Michael |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives