| 1 |
On 06/18/2010 11:29 AM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber wrote: |
| 2 |
> I am sure this is simple but I can't figure this out. I added a network |
| 3 |
> card to an existing Gentoo installation to have two in total. *ETH1* is |
| 4 |
> my new network card which is a Gigabit connection and *ETH0* is my old |
| 5 |
> network card with just an 100 Mbit connection. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I would like for the new network card (*ETH1*) to connect to a |
| 8 |
> 10.10.50.X (class C) network which accesses out local LAN and the old |
| 9 |
> network card (*ETH0*) to connect to a 10.10.60.x (class C) network which |
| 10 |
> is a wireless network that _does not communicate_ with the 10.10.50.X |
| 11 |
> network. This network also has internet access, if that is important. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I am not sure what to do. Right now both interfaces get DHCP but I |
| 14 |
> cannot ping either card or get network access. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Here is my current /etc/conf.d/net file: |
| 17 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 18 |
> config_eth1=( "dhcp" ) |
| 19 |
> dhcpcd_eth1="-N" |
| 20 |
> routes_eth1=( "10.10.50.0/24 via 10.10.50.1" |
| 21 |
> "10.10.1.0/24 via 10.10.50.1" |
| 22 |
> "10.10.10.0/24 via 10.10.50.1" |
| 23 |
> "10.10.20.0/24 via 10.10.50.1" |
| 24 |
> "10.10.30.0/24 via 10.10.50.1" |
| 25 |
> ) |
| 26 |
> config_eth0=( "10.10.60.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 brd 10.10.60.255" ) |
| 27 |
> routes_eth0=( "10.10.60.0/24 via 10.10.60.1" ) |
| 28 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> And here are my current routes: |
| 31 |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 32 |
> Kernel IP routing table |
| 33 |
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface |
| 34 |
> 10.10.20.0 10.10.50.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 35 |
> 10.10.50.0 10.10.50.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 36 |
> 10.10.50.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 37 |
> 10.10.1.0 10.10.50.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 38 |
> 10.10.30.0 10.10.50.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 39 |
> 10.10.60.0 10.10.60.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 |
| 40 |
> 10.10.60.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 |
| 41 |
> 10.10.10.0 10.10.50.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 42 |
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo |
| 43 |
> 0.0.0.0 10.10.50.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> Anything else I need to do or change? |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
This won't help you ping the card, but why do *you*, rather than DHCP, |
| 48 |
force a route for 10.10.50.0/24? And especially since your default route |
| 49 |
points the same direction. Why not just set the default route to |
| 50 |
10.10.50.1 and let it do its job? |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
But to answer your question, you should make sure the /etc/udev/rules.d |
| 53 |
files haven't changed your NIC numbering. What do you mean that they |
| 54 |
both get DHCP but you can't ping them. How do you know they're getting |
| 55 |
DHCP then? |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Can you even plumb the interface? |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
ifconfig eth0 up |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
Try ifconfig eth3 up. |
Archives