| 1 |
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.14 -0400, Tanstaafl ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> For those of us who prefer to stay with the stable portage, am I |
| 5 |
> correct |
| 6 |
> that once the 2.1.9 portage series goes stable, that we would then |
| 7 |
> remove the above from /etc/portage/bashrc? What would happen if I |
| 8 |
> forgot |
| 9 |
> to do so (ie, how important is it)? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
Yes once 2.1.9.x series of Portage goes stable (i.e.: if all goes well, |
| 12 |
by November) there won't be any need for adding the snipped; you'll |
| 13 |
still have to run at least once lafilefixer to avoid keeping stuff |
| 14 |
around on the system unfixed, but then it'll be taken care of |
| 15 |
transparently. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The only effect of forgetting it in there is that it'll take a couple of |
| 18 |
seconds extra at each build since both Portage and lafilefixer iterate |
| 19 |
over the package content, but no ill results will be caused, it is |
| 20 |
pretty safe. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” |
| 24 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, |
| 27 |
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/ |
Archives