Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:01:02
Message-Id: CAEH5T2PvcvUY95pXqcs4kGPpD=HhsiH8pK1fqR_iY6u2hRp0_A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade by Adam Carter
1 On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >>>> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
3 >>>> >> /lib64/libcrypt.so.1)
4 >>>> >>
5 >>>> >> There were no @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild found nothing. I
6 >>>> >> rebuilt pam and things seem to be working again. Are there any other
7 >>>> >> packages I should rebuild before encountering a problem? Or some way
8 >>>> >> to detect which need to be rebuilt? Should I re-emerge world against
9 >>>> >> my new glibc? :)
10 >
11 > How did you know to rebuild pam?
12 >
13 > Both /lib64/libc.so.6 and /lib64/libcrypt.so.1 are from glibc, and I
14 > interpret your error as  'libcrypt.so.1 couldn't find a GLIBC_2.14
15 > version of /lib64/libc.so.6', which doesn't make any sense to me as
16 > both files are from the same package. How could the version dependency
17 > between them be incorrect?
18
19 Sorry, I accidentally pasted the incomplete error message. It was part
20 of this kind of message in my syslog:
21
22 Nov 25 19:40:01 [cron] PAM unable to
23 dlopen(/lib64/security/pam_unix.so): /lib64/libc.so.6: version
24 `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /lib64/security/pam_unix.so)
25 Nov 25 19:40:01 [cron] PAM adding faulty module: /lib64/security/pam_unix.so
26
27 and xdm wouldn't restart after i upgraded glibc, until I rebuilt PAM.
28 Or maybe it was coincidental...

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.14.1 upgrade Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>