Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:14:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110622141242.7453a8e3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Dale |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:18:49 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add |
| 4 | > stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell |
| 5 | > off the reservation and needs to be removed. < sighs > Over the years, |
| 6 | > it adds up. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | That's because those are global flags. If you set package-specific flags |
| 9 | in /etc/portage/package.use, eix-test-obsolete will tell you when entries |
| 10 | can be removed. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Neil Bothwick |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Unsupported service (adj): Broken (see Demon) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |