1 |
Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 1:44 PM, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>> Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> writes: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> This works for me: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Nope. No change. |
12 |
> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Perhaps it has to do with a font not being available in the size needed |
15 |
>> for the menu? |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Maybe, but I'm out of ideas. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>>> can't imagine why the menu would require an "usable ISO8859 font"... |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> Try using another window manager? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> This implies installing another WM. I'll try fvwm. Never thought the |
27 |
> problem might be with the WM (openbox, a very unproblematic WM) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Thanks |
31 |
|
32 |
I'm using fvwm. I was having trouble with xterm once when I still used |
33 |
Fedora, and though I'm not sure, results might be different with |
34 |
different WMs (I seem to remember something about that). |
35 |
|
36 |
Other than that, there's a program called, IIRC, 'map' (available with |
37 |
Fedora, apparently not with Gentoo) which would show the memory usage of |
38 |
a process in detail. It also showed memory being used for fonts. So if |
39 |
we can find such a program, we might be able to find out which fonts are |
40 |
being used by xterm and see if there's a difference. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
PS: |
44 |
|
45 |
Font Path: |
46 |
/usr/share/fonts/misc/,/usr/share/fonts/TTF/,/usr/share/fonts/OTF/,/usr/share/fonts/Type1/,/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/,built-ins |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
That's by default. |
50 |
|
51 |
perl -e 'print "$_\n" foreach(split(/,/, "/usr/share/fonts/misc/,/usr/share/fonts/TTF/,/usr/share/fonts/OTF/,/usr/share/fonts/Type1/,/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/,/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/,built-ins"));' | xargs ls |
52 |
|
53 |
... shows files in each directory, except 'built-ins', of course. |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
That brings up the question if there is some alternative to perls split |
57 |
in coreutils or bash. The split of coreutils appears to be supposed to |
58 |
be doing something rather useless? |