| 1 |
On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:11:18 b.n. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:41 PM, b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: |
| 5 |
> >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <ng.ehahn@×××.de> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>>>> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') |
| 7 |
> >>>> |
| 8 |
> >>>> You know, there's an overlay... |
| 9 |
> >>> |
| 10 |
> >>> But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> At what point "stabilization" of KDE 4 is? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > None. It was about "availability", not "stabilization". |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Don't understand. But probably I wasn't making myself clear at all :) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> What I mean is, for people that do not want to mess with overlays, at |
| 19 |
> what point is kde 4 on the path towards being x86 stable? Any news? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
You'll have a long wait for that. The KDE devs are talking about 4.2 being |
| 22 |
useable by regular users. 4.1.1 is ~amd64 and ~x86 in the overlay and nothing |
| 23 |
has hit the official tree yet. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I have no idea when KDE4 will go stable, and I doubt anyone else does either - |
| 26 |
it's a very volatile thing - but I think I'm quite safe in guessing that it |
| 27 |
won't happen before 4.2 and not before early next year. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives